revised comments

From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 14:08:26 PDT

  • Next message: Kausik Datta: "Re: revised comments"

    My revised comments taking into account Jason's feedback:

    Example_12_4_3.v
    // Example in section 12.4.3
    module top;
    parameter genblk2 = 0;
    genvar i;

    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk1
    if (genblk2) reg a; // top.genblk1.a
    else reg b; // top.genblk1.b

    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk02 as genblk2 is already a
    declared identifier
    if (genblk2) reg a; // top.genblk02.a
    else reg b; // top.genblk02.b

    // generate scope would have been named genblk3 but is explicitly named g1
    for (i = 0; i < 1; i = i + 1) begin : g1 // block name
    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk1 as the first nested scope
    inside of g1
    if (1) reg a; // top.g1[0].genblk1.a
    end

    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk4 since it belongs to the
    fourth generate construct in scope "top" Note that the previous generate
    construct would have been named genblk3 if it had not been explicitly named g1
    for (i = 0; i < 1; i = i + 1)
    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk1 as the first nested scope of
    genblk4
    if (1) reg a; // top.genblk4[0].genblk1.a

    // generate scope is implicitly named genblk5
    if (1) reg a; // top.genblk5.a
    endmodule

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 13:50:48 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.