Re: Minutes for 4/5/04 meeting

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Sun May 02 2004 - 08:41:23 PDT

  • Next message: Alec Stanculescu: "errata/282: Re: errata/282: signing"

    Comments:

    > From the email vote on the generate proposal:
    > The generate proposal passed. Shalom had comments. Stu
    > opposed on the basis of more discussion required.
     
    > Shalom's comments for future discussion:

    Please note that some of those comments were from others, e.g.,
    Gord, that I recorded so that they should not be forgotten.

    > - Need to finish and add 12.8 Elaboration.
    > Committee concensus:
    > Jason had written a solution up, but Shalom felt it
    > was too complicated, so we removed it from the current
    > draft.

    Personally, I tend to feel that it is better to leave 12.8 in
    in its current version, than to leave it out entirely, if that
    is the current choice.

    > Page 12:
    > Should the example have a number? The committee
    > agrees it should. Also add comments, as indicated in
    > Cliff's attached document:
    >
    > http://boydtechinc.com/etf/archive/att-2437/02_Example_12_4_2_formatted.pdf

    In Cliff's version of this example, I found some of the comments unclear
    at first reading. I think they should be reworded. I am referring to
    lines like

    "and g1 (a, b, c); // if p,q==1,0 - and test.u1.g1 ..."

    It was not clear to me at first that "and test.u1.g1" means
    that if the conditions are met, then an AND gate called test.u1.g1
    is generated.

    Shalom 

    -- 
Shalom Bresticker                         Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Reuse Methodology                            Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                  Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                      Cell: +972 50 5441478

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun May 02 2004 - 08:23:31 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.