From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 01:50:00 PDT
The following reply was made to PR errata/16; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
To: "James A. Markevitch" <jam@magic.com>
Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Subject: Re: errata/16: PROPOSAL - 19.7: `line - meaning of level parameter
is unclear
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 12:02:00 +0300 (IDT)
James,
> > The compiler shall maintain the current line number and filename
> > of the file being compiled. The `line directive shall set the current line
> > number and filename to those specified in the directive.
>
> Suggest adding a clarifying sentence, such as "The new line number and
> filename apply on the next line in the source."
Later on, the proposal says,
"The number parameter ... specifies the new line number of the following text line."
So we could change this introductory text to
"The `line directive shall set the line number and filename of the following line to
those specified in the directive."
> > The directive can be specified anywhere within the Verilog HDL source
> > description. However, only white space may appear on the
> > same line as the `line directive.
> > All parameters in the `line directive are required.
> > The results of this file are not affected by the `resetall directive.
>
> Should this read "The results of this directive ..."?
Yes, typo, thanks.
> > Example:
> > `line 3 "orig.v" 2 // Next line is line 3 of orig.v after exiting include file
>
> The comment is no longer legal in the example.
Also correct, thanks.
I'd also like to remind that this proposal covers issue #291 as well.
Shalom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Wed May 05 2004 - 01:50:12 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.