Re: errata/586: PROPOSAL - Case signedness

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:00:01 PDT

  • Next message: Peter Ashenden: "Comments on events at NesCom meeting"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/586; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
    To: sharp@cadence.com, Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/586: PROPOSAL - Case signedness
    Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:53:15 -0400 (EDT)

    >Can you also suggest some wording to deal with #344, where some or all of
    >the expressions are real?
     
     I considered doing this at the same time. My concern is that the rules for
     expressions with real operands in 4.5 are questionable, or at least
     incomplete. They need to be rewritten along with other things in that
     section. I wasn't sure I wanted to start the rewrite with case expressions
     first, before the general rules for expressions were fixed.
     
     Steven Sharp
     sharp@cadence.com
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 23 2004 - 18:00:41 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.