Re: errata/113: revised generate proposal

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 07:20:00 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com: "errata/17: PROPOSAL - 12.1.3 is not clear enough about permitted defparam usage"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/113; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
    To: Jason Woolf <jasonw@cadence.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/113: revised generate proposal
    Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:19:51 +0300 (IDT)

     Hi, Jason,
     
     I think I need a minor edit of the generate document.
     
     While working on the proposal for issue #17, which uses the term
     "generate scope" in a forward reference, and I wanted to add a
     cross-reference to its definition, I found that it does not seem to be
     explicitly defined.
     
     The term is also used in the new 12.4 a number of times. Although when I
     reviewed it, I know I found and understand its meaning, I think it would
     be good to add a sentence which explicitly defines it, of the sort,
     "A <i>generate scope</i> is ...".
     
     Can you do that?
     
     Thanks,
     Shalom
     
     --
     Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
     Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
     Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
     POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478
       
     [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary
     
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 08 2004 - 07:20:19 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.