Re: errata/602: Extraneous semicolons in pulse_control_specparam

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Sun Jul 25 2004 - 03:10:00 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com: "errata/602: PROPOSAL - Extraneous semicolons in pulse_control_specparam"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/602; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
    To: eric_mahurin@yahoo.com
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/602: Extraneous semicolons in pulse_control_specparam
    Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:05:02 +0300 (IDT)

     I believe you are correct. I will issue a proposal.
     
     Thanks,
     Shalom
     
     
     On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 eric_mahurin@yahoo.com wrote:
     
    > According to the BNF in A.2.4, pulse_control_specparam (which is a specparam_assignment) should have a semicolon at the end and yet it is in a list_of_specparam_assignments separated by commas and ending in a semicolon (from specparam_declaration). The examples don't show these extra semicolons.
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 25 2004 - 03:10:18 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.