RE: errata/609: string should be a primary not an expression

From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Jul 30 2004 - 10:40:00 PDT

  • Next message: Brad Pierce: "Re: errata/608: mintypmax_expression usage"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/609; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
    To: <etf-bugs@boyd.com>
    Cc:
    Subject: RE: errata/609: string should be a primary not an expression
    Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:38:22 -0700

     I agree. To see how this was fixed in SystemVerilog (LRM-275), see
     
         http://www.eda.org/sv-ac/hm/att-1254/01-assertions_bnf.htm
     
     -- Brad
     
     -----Original Message-----
     From: owner-etf@boyd.com [mailto:owner-etf@boyd.com]On Behalf Of
     eric_mahurin@yahoo.com
     Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:02 AM
     To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
     Subject: errata/609: string should be a primary not an expression
     
     
    >Number: 609
    >Notify-List:
    >Category: errata
    >Originator: Eric Mahurin
    >Environment:
     In 4.2.3, strings are clearly described as operands, but in A.8.3, they must
     be the only thing in the expression. I propose that strings be move from an
     expression alternative to a string alternative. I have verilog code that
     used strings as operands in an expression (c == "\n").
    >Description:
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 30 2004 - 10:40:06 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.