From: Karen Pieper (Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:12:29 PDT
ETF Meeting for October 18, 2004
Attendance:
100000000111000000000000111110000 \
087654321210987654433211221109998 / Month
122200001000011112021121101022002 \
836835892136814691740073628413996 / Day
0 0 0 \
4 3 2 / Year
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa*aa Steven Sharp
aaaaaaa-aaaapaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-a*aa Karen Pieper
--aaaa-aaaaa-a----a--aa-aa--a-$aa Cliff Cummings
aaaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=-a Shalom Bresticker
--aaa-aaaaa--a-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa*aa Stefen Boyd
-aaaa--a-aaaaaaa-aaaaa-aaa-aaa$aa James Markevitch
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-a*a- Brad Pierce
--a-aaaaaaaaaaaaa-aaaaa-aaaaaa*a- Charles Dawson
----aaaa-aaaaa-aa-a---aa-a-aa-$a- Mike McNamara
aaaaaaaaaaaa--aa-aaaaaaaaaa---*aa Stu Sutherland
--a-a-a-aaaaa--a--------------*a- Tom Fitzpatrick
------------------------------*aa Elliot Mednick
a-aa----a--a-a-------aa---------- Don Mills
------------aaaa-----a----------- Jay Lawrence
---------a-aa-------a------------ Mehdi Mohtashemi
-------a--a--aaaa--aa------------ Kurt Baty
---------------a----------------- David Smith
------aa--aaaa-a----------------- Dennis Brophy
aaaa-aaaaaaaaaa------------------ Francoise Martinolle
---------aaaa-------------------- Drew Lynch
-------a---a--------------------- David Roberts
----------a---------------------- Ennis Hawk
--aaaaaa-a----------------------- Ronald Goodstein
---------a----------------------- Keith Gover
------aaa------------------------ Jason Woolf
--aaa---------------------------- Alec Stanculescu
----a---------------------------- Steven Dovitch
---a----------------------------- Geoffrey Coram
--------a------a--aaaaaaaaaaaa*aa Dennis Marsa
------------aaaa-aa-a-aaaaaaa-=-a Gordon Vreugdenhil
-------------aaa--aaa-aa-aaaaa$aa Anders Nordstrom
--------------------------aaa-$a- Ted Elkind
aa------------------------------- Mark Hartoog
a attended
p proxy
- absent
What is our schedule:
December 1 LRM Changes must be passed by the ETF, BTF, etc committees.
Datatypes work is going to the SV-BC.
In a previous meeting, we discussed errata that should be high priority.
Proposals were:
Syntax with libraries and configurations
175, 372, 99, 107, 108, 135, 248, 212, 501,
582, 350, 514
Order of operations WRT typing: signedness and reals
Multiple differing implementaions exist
Is the standard unclear?
282, 83, 215, 106, 454, 463, 486, 506, 35, 96, 344, 428, 624
multiple possible resolutions for hierarchical names
in generate
604 has a proposal
The chair directed everone's attention to
http://www.verilog.com/IEEEVerilog.html where a link to the IEEE
policy was reviewed.
Review of the minutes of the last ETF meeting (August 23, 2004).
Shalom suggests that we add to the configurations list: 350, 514
Shalom suggests that we add to the order of operations: 35, 96, 344, 428
Shalom notes that 46 is a typo. It should be 486
Shalom moves that we accept the minutes of the meeting as modified. Stu
seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes.
Issues:
ETF proposals:
Issue 17: Passed by the VSG now.
Issue 403: Passed by the ETF now.
Issue 425: Passed by the VSG now.
Issue 428: Should be moved back to open.
Issue 445: Passed by the ETF now.
Issue 554: Passed by the ETF now.
Issue 607: Passed by the ETF now.
Issue 602: Passed by VSG
Issue 603: Passed by VSG
Issue 619: Should be moved back to open.
Issue 604: Steven will talk with Jason about whether he means a
generate construct or if he wants nested ifs done all
at once.
Issue 620: Shalom moves that we accept the proposal. Steven
Seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes.
Issue 624: Should be moved back to open.
Issue 625: Shalom moves that we close this issue. Steven seconds.
No opposed. No abstain. Passes.
Issue 627: Shalom moves that we accept the proposal. Brad seconds.
No opposed. No abstain. Passes.
We discussed the possible projects for us to finish to create
a new version of the standard. We agreed that order of operations
was the most important thing for us to do.
We agree with the current understanding for the meaning of the evaluation. We also agree that reading the LRM may not come up with that meaning.
Due to lack of volunteers, we are not prepared to address the issues with evaluation order for this revision of the LRM. From this point until this revision of the LRM freezes, we will address issues for which individuals choose to make proposals rather than taking on large blocks of related errata.
------------------------------
------------------------------
Everybody moves that we adjourn at 10:33.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:02:35 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.