errata/648: Addition of Clause 2 is required

From: pieper@synopsys.com
Date: Tue Jan 25 2005 - 19:41:36 PST

  • Next message: brad.pierce@synopsys.com: "errata/486: PROPOSAL - 12.3.3: Implicit nets are not necessarily unsigned"

    >Number: 648
    >Notify-List:
    >Category: errata
    >Originator: pieper@synopsys.com
    >Environment:
    >Description:

    In response to the Clause numbering issue (adding Clause 2 to refer to other standards), Shalom moves that we add the current Clause 11 as a section of Clause 10 after the description of tasks, to minimize the necessary renumbering throughout the entire LRM. Also, move Clause 5 before Clause 12. James seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 25 2005 - 19:41:40 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.