Re: errata/639: PROPOSAL - fix use of "shall" and "may" by IEEE rules

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Sun Feb 06 2005 - 08:30:00 PST

  • Next message: brad.pierce@synopsys.com: "errata/619: PROPOSAL - What is the width of a range with z and x's in the bounds?"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/639; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/639: PROPOSAL - fix use of "shall" and "may" by IEEE
     rules
    Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:44:56 +0200 (IST)

     In 12.3.3, I took the following note
     
     "NOTE-Implementations may limit maximum number of ports in a module definition, but they will at least be 256."
     
     and turned it into the following normative text:
     
     "Implementations may limit the maximum number of ports in a module definition, but the limit shall be at least 256."
     
     
     --
     Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
     Design & Verification Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
     Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
     POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478
       
     [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Feb 06 2005 - 08:30:10 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.