Re: errata/428: PROPOSAL - 2.5.1: value of 16'shc, request for clarification

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Thu Feb 24 2005 - 00:29:55 PST

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "errata/653: 2005D6, A.7.4: edge_sensitive_path_declaration should be in A.7.2"

    Sorry, I just noticed. The first attachment, the current version,
    contains changebars showing the differences between it and 2001c.
    Ignore them.

    The change bars in the 2nd attachment show where there are differences
    due to this proposal.

    Shalom

    On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:

    > I attach 3 PDF versions of the "Integer constants" subclause (old 2.5.1,
    > new 3.5.1).
    >
    > The versions are:
    >
    > 1. current
    > 2. after changes in this proposal
    > 3. composite comparison. Curiously, this version does not show the old/
    > current version of Example 4, only the new version.
    >
    > 

    -- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 24 2005 - 00:10:36 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.