Re: Configs Intent - was: potential command line option

From: Clifford E. Cummings (cliffc@sunburst-design.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 22:54:52 PDT

  • Next message: Brophy, Dennis: "RE: Configs Intent - was: potential command line option"

    Hi, Brad -

    Was this discussed and approved in committee meetings? (I missed a large
    number of meetings and could have missed this discussion).

    I would prefer required semicolons as originally intended and just fix all
    my errors in the config section as previously noted.

    Regards - Cliff

    At 08:58 PM 4/20/2005, Brad Pierce wrote:
    >In SystemVerilog these semicolons are optional.
    >
    > http://www.eda.org/sv/Changes_draft6/LRM_Changes_A_BNF.html
    >
    >-- Brad
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: owner-btf@boyd.com [mailto:owner-btf@boyd.com]On Behalf Of
    >Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
    >Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:22 PM
    >To: Clifford E. Cummings
    >Cc: btf@boyd.com; etf@boyd.com; sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
    >Subject: Re: Configs Intent - was: potential command line option
    >
    >
    >Regarding the semicolons at the end of the statements, there is already an
    >ETF
    >issue on this. In fact, I think there are two. I think there is one issue
    >(# 372 ?), which lists this as one of several config issues, and I think
    >there
    >is another one ( 5xx ? 501 ?) which is dedicated to this issue.
    >
    >Shalom

    ----------------------------------------------------
    Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
    14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
    Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
    cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com
    Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 20 2005 - 22:36:03 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.