From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 05:50:00 PDT
The following reply was made to PR errata/525; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com>
To: Jim Vellenga <vellenga@cadence.com>
Cc: ptf-bugs@boyd.com
Subject: Re: errata/525: PROPOSAL - Memory for callback routine's structures
should be allocated by simulator
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:49:50 +0300
Maybe I misunderstood.
As written,
"The cb_rtn field of the s_cb_data structure shall be set to the application
routine, which shall be invoked when the simulator executes the callback,"
it is equivalent to saying,
"The cb_rtn field of the s_cb_data structure shall be set to the application
routine.
The application routine shall be invoked when the simulator executes the
callback."
Is that the intent?
When reading it, I thought the intent was to state which application routine
cb_rtn should point to.
Shalom
Jim Vellenga wrote:
> As far as the comma is concerned, I believe it to be
> correct. I have the 1994 version of the IEEE Standards
> Style Manual, Section 7.3.2, "That and which," which
> says that "'That' is best reserved in essential (or
> restrictive) clause, 'which' is appropriate in nonessential
> (or nonrestrictive), parenthetical clauses."
> In the present case, since there is no question
> as to which application routine we're talking about,
> the subordinate clause is "nonessential" or "nonrestrictive";
> that is, it does not further identify the application
> routine. So, ", which" is correct according to
> IEEE usage.
--
Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only
[ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 05:50:04 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.